USTR Seeks Public Input on Trade Measures Against China’s Maritime Dominance

The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is requesting public comments on proposed trade actions in response to China’s growing control over the global maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries. Following a Section 301 investigation, USTR determined that China’s policies have disadvantaged U.S. businesses and workers, prompting potential countermeasures.

Background of the Investigation

The investigation began in April 2024 after several U.S. labor unions filed a petition citing China’s long-standing efforts to dominate the shipbuilding and logistics sectors. Over the past three decades, China has significantly expanded its control, increasing its global shipbuilding market share from under 5% in 1999 to over 50% in 2023. Additionally, China now produces 95% of the world’s shipping containers and 86% of intermodal chassis, strengthening its influence over global trade logistics.

According to the USTR’s findings, China’s industrial policies have created unfair competitive conditions by displacing foreign businesses, limiting commercial opportunities, and posing economic security risks. As a result, USTR has determined that action is necessary under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Proposed Trade Actions

To address China’s competitive advantage, the USTR is considering several measures:

Service Fees on Chinese Shipping Operators – A fee of up to $1,000,000 per vessel entry into U.S. ports for operators with Chinese-built vessels.
Tariffs on Operators Using Chinese-Built Ships – Additional fees for companies that operate or have pending orders for Chinese-manufactured vessels.
Incentives for U.S.-Built Vessels – A system of fee reimbursements for operators using U.S.-manufactured ships.
Shipping Restrictions on U.S. Exports – A phased-in requirement that a portion of U.S. goods be transported on U.S.-flagged and U.S.-built vessels.
Security Measures Against Chinese Logistics Platforms – Possible restrictions on the use of LOGINK, a Chinese-developed logistics data platform, due to security concerns.

Public Comment Period and Hearing Details

The USTR is encouraging stakeholders to provide feedback on these proposed actions. The key deadlines are as follows:

February 21, 2025 – Public comment period opens.
March 10, 2025 – Deadline to request participation in the public hearing.
March 24, 2025 – Deadline to submit written comments.
March 24, 2025 – Public hearing at the U.S. International Trade Commission in Washington, D.C.
Seven days after the hearing – Deadline for post-hearing rebuttal comments.

Comments and requests to participate in the hearing can be submitted via USTR’s online portal at https://comments.ustr.gov/s/ using docket numbers USTR–2025–0002 (for written comments) and USTR–2025–0003(for hearing requests).

Adapting to the New US Aluminum and Steel Tariffs

The logistics and trade sectors are in constant flux, and the latest escalation in tariffs exemplifies this dynamic landscape. President Trump’s recent decision to elevate aluminum and steel tariffs from 10% to 25% on all imports, without exceptions for any country, necessitates that businesses remain vigilant and adaptable. This significant policy change—removing exemptions previously granted to key partners such as Canada, Mexico, and the European Union—requires strategic planning from importers and supply chain managers.

Understanding the New Tariffs

The hike to a 25% tariff on aluminum imports represents a substantial shift in U.S. trade policy. Earlier, certain nations had secured exemptions or quota-based allowances, but these have now been rescinded. Additionally, new requirements concerning the processing origins of North American aluminum aim to prevent tariff circumvention by countries like China and Russia.

The U.S. government justifies these measures under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, citing national security concerns and the need to bolster domestic aluminum production. However, the repercussions for the global supply chain are expected to be considerable.

Implications for Importers and Supply Chains

With the removal of exclusions, importers who previously benefited from duty-free aluminum must now account for increased costs and heightened compliance requirements. Manufacturers in industries such as automotive, aerospace, and construction, which rely heavily on aluminum, may face cost fluctuations as suppliers adjust their pricing structures.

Beyond financial impacts, logistics professionals should anticipate potential delays, challenges in customs processing, and the need to reassess sourcing strategies. For instance, foreign producers that had shifted operations to Mexico and Canada in recent years may now find their supply chains disrupted by the new restrictions, compelling importers to seek alternative solutions.

Strategies for Businesses

Evaluate Supplier Relationships: If the new tariffs affect your aluminum sourcing, it’s crucial to review existing contracts and explore alternative suppliers.
Incorporate Tariff Costs: Collaborate with financial and logistics partners to integrate the new tariff rates into your budgeting and pricing models.
Stay Abreast of Compliance Requirements: The updated processing origin requirements for North American aluminum will lead to more stringent customs inspections; ensuring thorough and accurate documentation is essential.
Partner with Experienced Logistics Providers: In times of regulatory change, having a knowledgeable freight forwarder is vital for navigating customs procedures, managing duties, and maintaining efficient cargo movement.

Future Forwarding: Guiding Your Cargo Through Change

At Future Forwarding, we recognize that change brings both challenges and opportunities. Our commitment to understanding each client’s unique needs allows us to offer tailored solutions that keep your supply chain resilient amidst evolving regulations.

Our comprehensive services include freight forwarding, customs brokerage, warehousing, and compliance consulting, all designed to ensure your cargo moves seamlessly, regardless of policy shifts.

If you have questions about how the new aluminum tariffs may affect your supply chain, contact Future Forwarding today. We’re here to help you plan proactively, mitigate disruptions, and keep your operations running smoothly.

Know Your Cargo: Strengthening Compliance in Maritime and Transportation Logistics

The complexities of global supply chains present both opportunities and risks for entities involved in the movement of goods. The Quint-Seal Compliance Note—issued by the Departments of Commerce, Treasury, Justice, State, and Homeland Security—emphasizes the importance of powerful compliance measures to prevent sanctions and export control violations. Companies operating within maritime and broader transportation industries must proactively mitigate the risk of facilitating illicit activities.

Understanding Sanctions and Compliance Risks

The global trade network involves multiple stakeholders, including vessel owners, exporters, brokers, freight forwarders, insurers, and financial institutions. However, this intricate ecosystem is vulnerable to exploitation by malign actors seeking to bypass U.S. sanctions. These actors employ various deceptive practices, including:

Manipulating vessel location and identification data (e.g., disabling or falsifying Automatic Identification System (AIS) signals).
Falsifying cargo documentation to obscure a shipment’s true origin or destination.
Engaging in ship-to-ship transfers to disguise illicit cargo movement.
Using abnormal shipping routes and frequent vessel re-registrations (“flag hopping”) to evade scrutiny.
Operating through opaque ownership structures to conceal beneficial ownership.

Failure to detect and prevent these activities can expose companies to severe legal, financial, and reputational consequences.

Best Practices for Strengthening Compliance

To ensure adherence to U.S. export controls and sanctions regulations, industry participants should implement a risk-based compliance framework, including:

Developing Comprehensive Compliance Programs
- Establish written policies and procedures aligned with U.S. government guidance.
- Communicate compliance expectations to all business partners.
Enhancing Location and Shipment Monitoring
- Conduct due diligence on vessel movement histories to detect irregularities.
- Investigate gaps in AIS data and implement contractual clauses prohibiting illicit activities.
Strengthening Due Diligence on Counterparties
- Conduct Know Your Customer (KYC) screenings and vet counterparties using government lists like the U.S. Consolidated Screening List.
- Verify the accuracy of bills of lading, licenses, and other shipping documents.
Improving Supply Chain Oversight
- Monitor cargo flow to prevent unauthorized diversions.
- Use open-source intelligence and commercial satellite imagery to verify reported shipment routes.
Industry-Wide Information Sharing
- Participate in industry forums to exchange risk intelligence and compliance best practices.
- Report suspicious activities to relevant U.S. authorities.

Enforcement Actions and Legal Consequences

The Department of Justice (DOJ) and other enforcement agencies have aggressively pursued civil and criminal actions against companies and individuals attempting to evade U.S. sanctions and export controls. Recent cases have targeted networks tied to sanctioned entities in Iran, Russia, North Korea, and China, demonstrating that non-compliance can result in asset seizures, financial penalties, and criminal prosecution.

By institutionalizing compliance measures and actively monitoring cargo movements, companies can safeguard their operations, ensure regulatory compliance, and contribute to a more secure global trade environment.

Want to know more? Reach out to us today.

The EU’s New Tariffs on Chinese Electric Vehicles

The European Commission recently announced the imposition of additional duties on imported Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), with rates reaching up to 38.1%. This move, set to take effect in July, aims to counteract what the EU perceives as excessive subsidies granted to Chinese manufacturers. However, this decision may provoke significant retaliatory measures from Beijing.

Background and Context

The EU’s decision follows a pattern seen in recent trade dynamics between the US and China. Less than a month ago, Washington announced plans to quadruple duties on Chinese EVs to 100%. The new tariffs, ranging from 17.4% to 38.1% on top of the standard 10% car duty, reflect a strong stance against what the EU views as unfair trade practices.

This policy shift marks a significant change in the EU’s trade approach, especially given the importance of the automotive industry. The EU has historically used trade defenses against China, but the focus on such a critical sector indicates a more aggressive strategy.

Impact on the Market

The new tariffs translate into billions of euros in extra costs for Chinese carmakers, a burden they will bear during a period of slowing demand and falling prices in their domestic market. European automakers, already facing competitive pressure from more affordable Chinese EVs, might find some relief. Chinese EVs currently hold about 8% of the EU market share, a figure projected to rise to 15% by 2025, largely due to their lower prices compared to EU-made models.

Despite the new tariffs, some experts believe that the impact on Chinese manufacturers will be limited. Industry representatives have indicated that the tariffs, averaging around 20%, were anticipated and won’t significantly affect the majority of Chinese firms.

Potential Retaliation from China

The announcement has not gone unnoticed by Beijing. The Chinese government has already expressed its intent to safeguard its interests, viewing the EU’s measures as protectionist. This tension echoes previous trade disputes, where both sides imposed tit-for-tat tariffs, affecting various industries.

China has also started an anti-dumping investigation into European imports, signaling potential broader retaliatory actions. This development raises concerns among European industries heavily reliant on exports to China, such as the automotive and spirits sectors.

Strategic Considerations for Stakeholders

For Western companies that export vehicles from China to Europe, the EU’s decision presents new challenges. These companies have been deemed cooperative by the EU and may face lower tariff rates, but the overall uncertainty could disrupt their supply chains and market strategies.

The European automotive industry is divided on the issue. While some welcome the protection against cheap imports, others warn that tariffs could harm the industry by increasing costs and limiting market access. There is a consensus that the negative effects of tariffs could outweigh the benefits, especially for industries with significant exports to China.

Future Outlook

The EU’s provisional duties are set to apply from July 4, with the investigation continuing until November. The outcome could lead to definitive duties lasting up to five years. The potential for retroactive tariffs further complicates the situation.

As the international trade landscape evolves, stakeholders must stay informed and agile. Companies may need to adjust their sourcing strategies, explore new markets, or invest in local production to mitigate the impact of these tariffs. Additionally, ongoing diplomatic negotiations and trade discussions will likely shape the future of EU-China economic relations.

In conclusion, the EU’s decision to impose additional tariffs on Chinese EVs represents a significant shift in trade policy, reflecting broader geopolitical tensions and economic strategies. Businesses involved in the automotive sector, as well as those in related industries, should closely monitor developments and prepare for potential changes in the global trade environment.

The Atlantic Declaration: Strengthening Trade and Economic Partnership Between the US and UK

In a significant move to bolster economic ties and address pressing global challenges, the United States and the United Kingdom have announced the Atlantic Declaration. This collaborative effort, hailed as the “first of its kind,” focuses on fostering cooperation in various sectors, including clean energy, critical minerals, and artificial intelligence. With a shared commitment to economic growth, supply chain resilience, job creation, and technological advancement, the two nations aim to adapt and reimagine their alliance.

Pillar 1: Ensuring U.S.-UK Leadership in Critical and Emerging Technologies

Recognizing the importance of critical and emerging technologies, such as semiconductors, quantum technologies, and artificial intelligence, the US and UK are committed to leading in these sectors. The partnership will involve joint research and development efforts, public-private dialogue, mobilization of private capital, and talent flows. By collaborating on these technologies, both countries can drive innovation, economic growth, and job creation while safeguarding their national security interests.

Pillar 2: Advancing Ever Closer Cooperation on Technology Protection and Supply Chains

To address evolving national security risks and protect sensitive technologies, the US and UK will align and update their regulatory frameworks. This includes export controls, investment screening, sanctions, and research and development security. By coordinating their efforts, both nations aim to prevent the leakage of emerging technologies and enhance information sharing on threat intelligence. The focus on technology protection and resilient supply chains will strengthen trade relations and ensure economic security.

Pillar 3: Partnering on an Inclusive and Responsible Digital Transformation

As digital transformation becomes increasingly vital for economic growth, the US and UK are committed to working together on an inclusive and responsible approach. By fostering collaboration in areas such as 5G and 6G telecommunications, synthetic biology, and AI safety, both countries can drive innovation while addressing societal concerns and ethical considerations. This partnership will promote a thriving digital economy and provide opportunities for businesses and workers on both sides of the Atlantic.

Pillar 4: Building the Clean Energy Economy of the Future

Recognizing the need to transition to clean energy, the US and UK will collaborate on clean energy technologies, infrastructure development, and reducing reliance on Russian fuel in the civil nuclear sector. By investing in clean energy industries and strengthening supply chains, both nations can drive sustainable economic growth, mitigate climate change, and create new employment opportunities in the energy sector.

Pillar 5: Strengthening Alliance Across Defense, Health Security, and Space

The Atlantic Declaration also emphasizes the importance of deepening the alliance between the US and UK across defense, health security, and space. By leveraging their expertise and resources, both nations can enhance global security, respond to emerging health threats, and collaborate on space exploration and research. This multifaceted cooperation further strengthens the economic partnership by fostering cross-sector collaboration and knowledge sharing.

The Atlantic Declaration marks a significant milestone in the economic partnership between the United States and the United Kingdom. By focusing on critical and emerging technologies, technology protection, digital transformation, clean energy, and defense cooperation, both nations seek to drive economic growth, job creation, and shared prosperity. This collaborative effort sets the stage for future advancements in trade, innovation, and sustainable development.

Ready to experience the future of logistics excellence? Reach out to Future Forwarding today and let us be your trusted partner in achieving seamless supply chain operations. Whether you need full-service logistics support or assistance in specific areas, we have the expertise and dedication to meet your needs.

Tag: Global Trade

UK-EU SPS Deal: Relaxed Border Checks After April 2025

A Sudden Pivot from Full Checks

Impact on UK Ports and Border Control Infrastructure

What This Means for Importers and Exporters

Conclusion